<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Comparison Exposes Quirky Japanese Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/</link>
	<description>Nick Ramsay blogging from Gifu, Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>On an EEE PC here. It's not so good but then it serves me right for being on an EEE PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On an EEE PC here. It&#8217;s not so good but then it serves me right for being on an EEE PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>I use a DELL 24" 1920X1200 (?) so I am sure people with smaller screens hate my layout.

I run fullscreen with dropaway browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a DELL 24&#8243; 1920X1200 (?) so I am sure people with smaller screens hate my layout.</p>
<p>I run fullscreen with dropaway browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>Yes you are right Nick and it was the font size not the width. I'm learning new things everyday!!!
Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you are right Nick and it was the font size not the width. I&#8217;m learning new things everyday!!!<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ramsay</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ramsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>Yep, but we all used that resolution a few years ago. I'm currently on 1440x900, so even 1024x768 looks chunky to me :-P 

We must read different BBC websites because the one I see is still slim enough for 800px users, but I'm sure they'll change soon. I do remember them giving the site a face lift, and they might have made the font smaller or something, but they haven't changed the width yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, but we all used that resolution a few years ago. I&#8217;m currently on 1440&#215;900, so even 1024&#215;768 looks chunky to me <img src='http://www.longcountdown.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We must read different BBC websites because the one I see is still slim enough for 800px users, but I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll change soon. I do remember them giving the site a face lift, and they might have made the font smaller or something, but they haven&#8217;t changed the width yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ramsay</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ramsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>Good point, and that reminds me why I prefer desktops to laptops - I can attach two monitors! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, and that reminds me why I prefer desktops to laptops - I can attach two monitors! <img src='http://www.longcountdown.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>After reading this, as "Contamination" did, I too did a quick check and sheesh, 800x600 is really only for people who have eyesight problems is it not?? Trying to take everything in at a glance is nearly impossible and 1024 does allow you to do this.  
I do remember the BBC website changing over and at the time, thought something was wrong with my computer screen haa haa haa. I'm not the most computer savy person in the world!!!!!!!
Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this, as &#8220;Contamination&#8221; did, I too did a quick check and sheesh, 800&#215;600 is really only for people who have eyesight problems is it not?? Trying to take everything in at a glance is nearly impossible and 1024 does allow you to do this.<br />
I do remember the BBC website changing over and at the time, thought something was wrong with my computer screen haa haa haa. I&#8217;m not the most computer savy person in the world!!!!!!!<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Y-N</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Y-N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Nick, although most of your readers may be using a 1024x768 display, not everyone runs full screen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, although most of your readers may be using a 1024&#215;768 display, not everyone runs full screen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ramsay</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ramsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this blog used to be 800px wide, but only about 5% were reading with 800x600, so I made the change to 1024. Of course, 5% of Yahoo's readers is a very big number, but I think they've done the right thing.

IE7 was crashing on me throughout December, so I've switched to Firefox.   If Microsoft fix the problems with IE7 then I'll switch back because Firefox is an ugly, slow, piece of junk! Oh well, at least it's stable. :rolleyes:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this blog used to be 800px wide, but only about 5% were reading with 800&#215;600, so I made the change to 1024. Of course, 5% of Yahoo&#8217;s readers is a very big number, but I think they&#8217;ve done the right thing.</p>
<p>IE7 was crashing on me throughout December, so I&#8217;ve switched to Firefox.   If Microsoft fix the problems with IE7 then I&#8217;ll switch back because Firefox is an ugly, slow, piece of junk! Oh well, at least it&#8217;s stable. :rolleyes:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.japansoc.com</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>www.japansoc.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Examining Japanese Culture with Yahoo...&lt;/strong&gt;

Take a look at this comparison of Japan's new-look Yahoo homepage, and the .com version. You'll see all kinds of cultural differences from the menu alone. I've highlighted such Japanese interests as pets, beauty, shopping, superstitions, rail and fo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Examining Japanese Culture with Yahoo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Take a look at this comparison of Japan&#8217;s new-look Yahoo homepage, and the .com version. You&#8217;ll see all kinds of cultural differences from the menu alone. I&#8217;ve highlighted such Japanese interests as pets, beauty, shopping, superstitions, rail and fo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contamination</title>
		<link>http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Contamination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longcountdown.com/2008/01/09/yahoo-comparison-exposes-quirky-japanese-culture/#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>Upon checking the stats of my readers, the vast majority have 1024 or higher - of course I also use 1024 myself.

For the purposes of testing for this comment, I quickly checked at 800x600 - it hurt my eyes. Too chunky!

Though IE looks better at lower resolutions than FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon checking the stats of my readers, the vast majority have 1024 or higher - of course I also use 1024 myself.</p>
<p>For the purposes of testing for this comment, I quickly checked at 800&#215;600 - it hurt my eyes. Too chunky!</p>
<p>Though IE looks better at lower resolutions than FF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
