Recent Developments for 9/11 Truth

I don’t expect many of you follow “9-11 truth” quite as much as I do, and since the mainstream media refuses to touch the subject, let me share a few recent developments that add weight to the growing understanding that 9/11 was not what we were led to believe.

  1. Whistleblower – Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, previously gagged by the Bush administration, blew the whistle on government corruption when she testified under oath about former and present congressmen accepting bribes from Turkish lobbyists. She previously claimed that the US maintained ‘intimate relations’ with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, “all the way until that day of September 11.”
  2. Whistleblower – Former FEMA videographer Kurt Sonnenfeld, currently living in exile in Argentina, went public about his persecution at the hands of U.S authorities after he refused to hand in the 29 tapes of “disturbing material” he filmed at Ground Zero.
  3. Scientific evidence – an international team of independent scientists discovered a military-grade explosive, nanothermite, in the dust from the World Trade Center – Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe (.pdf)
  4. Pentagon Eye Witnesses – A 3-year independent investigation into the attack at the Pentagon revealed that the actual flight path of the aircraft was considerably different to the “official” path. Learn why this is significant here.
  5. 800+ Architects and Engineers – The number of architectural and engineering professionals who publicly support the controlled demolition theory has surpassed the 800 mark.
  6. 9/11 Commissioners Admit Stonewalling – Actor Charlie Sheen recently wrote an open letter titled “Twenty Minutes with the President” which described a fictional interview with President Obama. In it, he correctly points out that “60% of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11″. Read their individual statements and those of other credible people here.

On this eighth anniversary of 9/11, I support the NYC Coalition for Accountability to get an independent, impartial investigation into the 9/11 attacks, and having read point 6 above, everyone else should, too.

Tags: ,

6 comments

  1. I still think you’re nuts for buying into this stuff, but I’m happy you don’t hate me for disagreeing with you! Ha ha. Having said that, I’m glad that even though your post today, September 11th, is about the truth movement, at least it is still about the attacks. I’m annoyed at the folks who are trying to co-opt it and turn it into an environmentalist green day. Sigh.

    • Always appreciate your comments on my annual 9/11 post, even if I do think you are completely balmy for accepting the Bin Laden box-cutter conspiracy theory! Perhaps if you read World Architecture News instead of Perez Hilton, you might change your tune.

      If you still reject the “Active Thermite” evidence (which remains scientific fact until proven false) then answer me one question: Do you support the families, first responders and survivors of September 11 in their push for a real investigation, or not?

      • What the heck makes you think I read Perez Hilton? I can’t stand that jerk. That’s just insulting. You obviously have a lower view of me than I previously thought.

  2. I’m not going to bother reading the linked articles, but I will say that while I could accept that there is a possibility that the CIA/FBI/whatever deliberately overlooked some intelligence, I do find the thermite/”pull it”/missile at the Pentagon stories batshit crazy, to use a technical term.

    Look at Lockerbie – a total failure to frame two guys from a country we all love to hate when there is a lot of evidence to suggest a Syrian/Lebanon connection dating back from the mid-1990s, yet somehow I’m supposed to accept that with 10’s, if not 100’s or 1,000’s of US and UK citizens (the BBC/Building 9 not fallen bit gets shown as an implication the Beeb were in on the script) involved, nothing but rumour and theory has leaked out.

    • I’m not going to bother reading the linked articles

      That says a lot. Ken, I’m not interested in what you are willing to accept and what you think is batshit crazy. As I posted above, it’s a scientific fact that nano-thermite was found in the WTC dust. Catch up, will you!

      I could accept that there is a possibility that the CIA/FBI/whatever deliberately overlooked some intelligence

      And rather than supporting a call for a new investigation, you post drivel about “Building 9″???

  3. News just in:

    In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before the voters of New York City this November.

    (source)